Skip to main content

Discontinue The Donations By Government Bodies To Groups, Charities, And Individual Gift

Governments should not be donating taxpayer monies to civic organizations


Long overlooked by many city, county, state, and national government bodies is the practice of handing out taxpayer funds for local groups, charities, and gifts.  In a local incident, the policy had been for the city to donate flowers to families of employees when someone died.  The council eliminated that provision from their policies, as it didn't deserve to be paid by the taxpayers.

When someone loses a loved one, it is tragic, but is it for the government, at any level, to provide gifts of sympathy on taxpayer money?  In this case, it was just city employees and no one else.  If someone wanted to relay their sorrow, it should be done on their own money.  Individuals have always opened their hearts and pocketbooks to friends in both good and bad times.  The government is not needed, nor wanted there.

Likewise, governments should not be donating public monies to various civic organizations, outside of possible loans.  The public interest must always be weighed and when it isn't served, the donation of money should be denied.  Any person responsible for determining tax disbursements must be especially careful in how tax money is spent.  It is not personal money to support pet projects, that of a friend, or any activity failing to serve the public interest.

This country is based on limited, restrained government.  Civic donations, and even subsidies, granted by government bodies too often serve the ideology and interests of the individuals on the board or council rather than the public.  Ethanol, for example, is a known loser fuel, and yet has received nearly $50 billion in taxpayer money.  The national mandate for alternative fuel sustains its survival when it should be left to die.  It exists solely because of politics.

Civic donations, by and large, should be left to individuals to choose.  The taxpayer should decide whether they want to donate to a specific cause, not a government body.  If the need is there, the average American will support it.  Leaving the choices to a select few, based on money that isn't theirs, is like signing your check and leaving it to a stranger to spend.

The bottom line is that every disbursement of taxpayer money must serve the public good and not that of an individual councilor, county commissioner, or politician.  When it doesn't government grows, and individual freedoms are diminished.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Needs To Be Done To Stop Sex Trafficking & Pedophilia

Human Trafficking Statistics by State [Edited to add:  2/3/21] 2/2/21:   64 arrested in Riverside County anti-human trafficking operation The following Coachella Valley residents were arrested for soliciting prostitution: Gabriel Alvarez, 28 of Coachella Douglas Ayala, 43 of Twentynine Palms Monte Bertoldo, 53 of Palm Springs Rutilio Brito, 33 of La Quinta Florencio Lopez, 50 of Thermal Rodrigo Macias-Leal, 21 of Cathedral City Ricardo Pachuca, 23 of Indio Juan Poblano-Martinez, 48 of Thermal Goldsborough Purnell, 62 of Palm Springs Eliuth Ramirez, 22 of Thermal Enrique Ramirez, 23 of Thermal Adam Sambrano, 39 of Indio Francisco Scott, 38 of Coachella Anthony Smith, 26 of Palm Desert Kyle Smith, 26 of Palm Desert William Spicknall, 37 of Palm Desert Thomas Stanford, 42 of Indio Manuel Vega, 44 of Thermal All of the suspects were released after signing agreements guaranteeing they will appear at scheduled court hearings. [Updated to add: 2/2/21] January 2021:  Jon We...

Censorship, Media Bias, and Fake Impeachment Charges

Censorship, Media Bias, and Fake Impeachment Charges President Trump hasn't even left office and the left has run over all conservatives in its quest for Communism.  The unprecedented censorship and yet another fruitless impeachment process couldn't wait.  After calling for violence at least 28 times in the last year, the Democrats have the gall to suggest Trump incited violence on January 6th.  Anyone reading his message knows that claim has absolutely no merit whatsoever. In fact, read it yourself : Donald Trump: (02:44) The media will not show the magnitude of this crowd. Even I, when I turned on today, I looked, and I saw thousands of people here, but you don’t see hundreds of thousands of people behind you because they don’t want to show that. We have hundreds of thousands of people here, and I just want them to be recognized by the fake news media. Turn your cameras please and show what’s really happening out here because these people are not going to take it any lo...

How ACORN, Obama, and Bill Clinton started the sub prime crisis

ACORN that is continually in trouble for voter fraud also pushed the sub prime mortgage crisis that has destabilized our economy.   Disturbingly, Barack Obama promised ACORN that it was going to shape our national agenda. ACORN was started in the 1970’s by Radicals George Wiley & Wade Rathke, with input from sociologists, Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, started ACORN in the 1970's.   All of them are neo-Marxist ideologists. Barack Obama's Start In ACORN ACORN is made up of several legally distinct parts including local non-profits, a national lobbying organization, and the ACORN Housing Corporation.   ACORN is partisan and always aligned with the Democratic Party on policy. Obama began to work for ACORN via Project Vote in 1992 and as a trainer for the "power" seminars.   ACORNs "People’s Platform Preamble" includes " We are an uncommon people. We are the majority, forged from all minorities.   We are the masses of many, not the...