Skip to main content

Individual Rights Lost

Americans continue to stand by while their rights are being stripped a little at a time. Fathers can't get custody, ex parte orders mean you're guilty until proven innocent, and criminal public officials trespass under the guise of "sovereign immunity."


California takes it yet another step.
California: COURT: NO WARRANT NEEDED TO SEARCH CELL PHONE


The government now tells us how we should build our homes down to the screw, how our sex at birth determines whether we should get custody in adulthood, that we can't carry a cell phone without an expectation of privacy, and that public officials can do anything they want.

Most Americans sit idly by while their individual rights have been slowly taken from them over the last 30 years and more. The individual rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution are now mostly history, taken from us incrementally. In fact, the slow process by which these freedoms were stripped from the American people went largely unnoticed. It is only when they encounter the injustice of our legal system that they begin to understand. Those that have encountered it are discouraged and angered by the system. Our forefathers envisioned more and promised more.

There's hope now that the Tea Party has emerged. We must elect individuals who believe in our original constitution, the bible, and not some watered down version of laws that place all power in the government.

"All evil needs is for good men to do nothing." The Bible. "Hate what is evil; cling to what is good." Romans 12:9

Comments

  1. Sovereign immunity in Minnesota was ousted by legislation in 1976 yet is still utilized under claims of "official immunity," "statutory immunity," and "vicarious immunity." Even though case law is limited in regards to immunity, immunity is lost if the official fails to perform ministerial and day-to-day (operational level) duties. It also fails in cases of bad faith and malice. If you are wronged, you have a civil duty (in the name of justice) to pursue your claim. All evil needs to succeed is for good men to do nothing. Are you doing nothing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. See how the government is "legally" tracking individuals....http://truckersteve.org/2011/04/government-legally-tracking-you-2010/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How ACORN, Obama, and Bill Clinton started the sub prime crisis

ACORN that is continually in trouble for voter fraud also pushed the sub prime mortgage crisis that has destabilized our economy.   Disturbingly, Barack Obama promised ACORN that it was going to shape our national agenda. ACORN was started in the 1970’s by Radicals George Wiley & Wade Rathke, with input from sociologists, Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, started ACORN in the 1970's.   All of them are neo-Marxist ideologists. Barack Obama's Start In ACORN ACORN is made up of several legally distinct parts including local non-profits, a national lobbying organization, and the ACORN Housing Corporation.   ACORN is partisan and always aligned with the Democratic Party on policy. Obama began to work for ACORN via Project Vote in 1992 and as a trainer for the "power" seminars.   ACORNs "People’s Platform Preamble" includes " We are an uncommon people. We are the majority, forged from all minorities.   We are the masses of many, not the...

Minnesota Governments Lack of Transparency

Data Practices Act Defendants in Marvin Pirila & Gail Francett e v. Thomson Township, etal., denied access to relevant information to their legal matter pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), even after learning it did not apply to them.   The MGDPA does not apply to towns, except those exercising special town powers under Minn. Stat. § 368.01 and located within the 7-county metropolitan area (Minn. Stat. § 13.02, Subd. 11).   Minn. Stat. § 473.121 Subd. 2 defines Metropolitan areas and does not include defendant Thomson Township. Townships are to provide access to public data upon reasonable requests .   In this particular manner, the defendants refused to voluntarily answer information requests, letters, and emails.   Thomson Township attorney David Pritchett interfered with informal discovery by writing plaintiffs and stating they were “… hereby instructed to cease and desist from making contact with such persons for the pur...