Skip to main content

Boost the Housing Market by Revising Building Codes

The building codes are overly restrictive, time-consuming, and costly. Many of the requirements are simply nuisances and provide no benefit of any kind.

By the time all of the required professionals are paid, the idea of making money from your venture is greatly diminished. New constructions and many renovations require structural engineers, master plumbers, master electricians, and architects to complete. You will end up spending thousands for designs/plans, that go to zoning boards and inspectors, who review them before issuing a permit. In my own personal case, the building permit itself took two months to get after all of the required paperwork was submitted. This kind of delay can kill a project by itself. Too many people equates to a lot of delay.

Projects should be able to proceed in part so as to eliminate delays. It's allowable in the code, but the option is the inspectors'. Unfortunately, we had a building inspector who was only interested in delaying the project until he knew where every screw went. Even then, he was highly reluctant to proceed.

The code tells you which way the doors should swing, how you should drywall, if you need railings, etc. Some of it is necessary, but come on, when is enough enough. Make the process easier, quicker, and less costly. The sheer stress of navigating the bureacratic process of building is the biggest deterent itself. If you decide to take it on, the costs and delays are the next obstacle. And, in the end, you hope that you can one day earn some equity in your home or make some money back on your investment. Those possibilities get more difficult with the constant addition of more building codes.

Can you remember the day when building permits were easy to get? I can. The number of tragedies avoided with today's enormous requirements is negligible, or simply unknown. Everyone used to be a carpenter and those buildings are still standing. When and why did we allow our personal freedoms to be so micromanaged by government entities? Yes, high-rise, corporate, and businesses need to follow certain guidelines to insure the safety of everyone, but the personal homeowner should have some latitude. If we applied these same guidelines to driving, we'd all be driving 5 mph to avoid serious accident, wearing multiple seatbelts, and have 360 degree surround airbags. It would save a lot of lives, but it would take all day to get anywhere.

We are supposed to be free, liberated Americans who weigh their various options and decide from there. Today, we have assigned our government officials to decide too much for us.

Where will we be if we continue to hand off our personal liberties? We are already headed towards socialism -- the first step to dictatorship.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How ACORN, Obama, and Bill Clinton started the sub prime crisis

ACORN that is continually in trouble for voter fraud also pushed the sub prime mortgage crisis that has destabilized our economy.   Disturbingly, Barack Obama promised ACORN that it was going to shape our national agenda. ACORN was started in the 1970’s by Radicals George Wiley & Wade Rathke, with input from sociologists, Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, started ACORN in the 1970's.   All of them are neo-Marxist ideologists. Barack Obama's Start In ACORN ACORN is made up of several legally distinct parts including local non-profits, a national lobbying organization, and the ACORN Housing Corporation.   ACORN is partisan and always aligned with the Democratic Party on policy. Obama began to work for ACORN via Project Vote in 1992 and as a trainer for the "power" seminars.   ACORNs "People’s Platform Preamble" includes " We are an uncommon people. We are the majority, forged from all minorities.   We are the masses of many, not the...

Minnesota Governments Lack of Transparency

Data Practices Act Defendants in Marvin Pirila & Gail Francett e v. Thomson Township, etal., denied access to relevant information to their legal matter pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), even after learning it did not apply to them.   The MGDPA does not apply to towns, except those exercising special town powers under Minn. Stat. § 368.01 and located within the 7-county metropolitan area (Minn. Stat. § 13.02, Subd. 11).   Minn. Stat. § 473.121 Subd. 2 defines Metropolitan areas and does not include defendant Thomson Township. Townships are to provide access to public data upon reasonable requests .   In this particular manner, the defendants refused to voluntarily answer information requests, letters, and emails.   Thomson Township attorney David Pritchett interfered with informal discovery by writing plaintiffs and stating they were “… hereby instructed to cease and desist from making contact with such persons for the pur...